Hello
everyone, this is Mizuki Yanagisawa. Today I want to introduce you about our
debate in order to remember what was going on and what were the strong point, and
the weak point at the debate. The topic we discussed was "Tourism helps people in
tourist communities".
First of all, I want to tell you about my
role in the debate and the points I had made. As there are three different
roles, such as agree team, disagree team and a judge, I played a role of being in
agree team. In the debate I made four points that support our idea: about
affording people’s job, development of tourist area’s economy, improvement of infrastructure
and tourist’s benefits (culture, etc). I and my partner, Yui, already had made
the script so what we had to do before the debate starts was just to mix and
unite our main opinions. It was quite smooth since we have already made up our
point precisely. (114words)
Secondly, I want to tell you the best point
made by the opposing team. Through all their four points, they mainly focused
on environmental problem in tourism community. The point I was especially
impressed was that they show a personal example or experience. For example, one
of the speakers talked about her mother’s experience that she is a tour
conductor and knows much about environmental problem on these areas. Moreover, the
other speaker showed me the poster which depicted how Mountain Fuji was polluted
by the tourists. As they showed their personal experience and specific example
like Mt.Fuji I felt much familiar to this topic and I think it is very good way
to assert one’s opinion. (117words)
Finally, I have learned a lot from this
debate experience. There are two points that I want to pick up. First point is
that, in our debate, we did not talk about the same situation. I mean, the
disagree team was talking about the tourism concern in developed countries such
as Japan or U.S. However, we, as the agree team, were talking about developing
countries such as Thai or Singapore. Therefore, we had have discussed about
which country should be focused on so we could discuss about just one country
or just one situation. Another point is that I learned is that any posters or
personal experiences can make the point (or opinion) much stronger. Even though
I was an opponent of the disagree team, I could easily understand their opinion
and what is going on at the tourism community right now. Overall, I really
enjoyed discussing and debating about this topic and I think it was great
experience for me. (161words)
Hello, this is Yoshimi. I read this blog and felt your team's debate was very different from mine. You talked about tourism in Japan and other countries, but we focused on only in Japan. I thought I should have more worldwide view of events. While debate was different, I had the same thought that posters and experiences can surpport the point. Debating was a bit difficult, but this time we had a good experience.
ReplyDeleteHi, this is Ms. MacGregor. I am so glad to hear that you thought this activity was fruitful. Debating is very difficult even in your own language so I understand that challenges that it posed. However, you were well prepared and I think that is the key to sinking or swimming. I will have to consider revising the topic in the future to make the situation specific - thank you for your suggestion and your excellent reflection!
ReplyDelete